{"id":521,"date":"2017-09-28T15:43:27","date_gmt":"2017-09-28T15:43:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nixlaw.wpengine.com\/?post_type=news&#038;p=521"},"modified":"2025-08-13T08:33:14","modified_gmt":"2025-08-13T08:33:14","slug":"npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google","status":"publish","type":"news","link":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/","title":{"rendered":"NP Defeats Motion for Summary Judgment by Google"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For more than six years, NP and its co-counsel in the matter <em>Woods v. Google Inc.<\/em>, Case No. 11-cv-1263, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, have been prosecuting claims against Google related to its AdWords advertising program.\u00a0 Woods alleges that Google systematically overcharged advertisers for years in violation of their agreement and sent advertisements outside the areas advertisers wanted but lied about where the clicks were coming from.\u00a0 Google attempted to escape liability for these claims by motion for summary judgment.\u00a0 NP defeated this motion on September 28, 2017, when the Court entered its order granting-in-part and denying-in-part the motion.\u00a0 The Court rejected Google\u2019s arguments as to Woods\u2019 breach of contract claim related to \u201cSmart Pricing\u201d discounts Google was supposed to provide and Woods\u2019 Unfair Competition Law claim for misrepresenting where Google would send advertisements.<\/p>\n<p>NP utilized the extensive documentary support and deposition testimony they have developed over the last six years to defeat the motion.\u00a0 While most of this evidence currently remains under seal, the Court found that it presented clear fact issues for trial.\u00a0 The case is now able to proceed to the class certification stage and trial so that Woods and the putative class may obtain the relief they have been seeking for so long.<\/p>\n<p>The Plaintiff is represented by NP partners Michael Angelovich, Jeffrey Angelovich, Bradley Beckworth, and Drew Pate.<\/p>\n<p>A copy of the Court&#8217;s order denying summary judgment on most of plaintiff&#8217;s claims can be viewed below:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_646\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-646\" style=\"width: 75px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/nixlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Google-Summary-Judgment-Order.pdf\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-646\" src=\"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/NP-ARTICLE-NEW-PDF.jpg\" alt=\"NP article\" width=\"75\" height=\"98\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-646\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><small><strong>Google SJ Denial<\/strong><\/small><br \/><small>09\/28\/2017<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"categories":[],"tags":[],"news_attorney_categories":[37],"news_categories":[17],"news_practice_areas":[302],"news_years":[49],"class_list":["post-521","news","type-news","status-publish","hentry","news_attorney_categories-drew-pate","news_categories-case-update","news_years-49"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>NP&#039;s Summary Judgment vs. Google | Nix Patterson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NP&#039;s Summary Judgment vs. Google | Nix Patterson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"For more than six years, NP and its co-counsel in the matter Woods v. Google Inc., Case No. 11-cv-1263, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, have been prosecuting claims against Google related to its AdWords advertising program.\u00a0 Woods alleges that Google systematically overcharged advertisers for years in violation of [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Nix Patterson, LLP\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Nix-Patterson-Roach-LLP-560328770976672\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-13T08:33:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Screen-Shot-2022-12-23-at-11.58.57-AM.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1522\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"940\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutos\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NP's Summary Judgment vs. Google | Nix Patterson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"NP's Summary Judgment vs. Google | Nix Patterson","og_description":"For more than six years, NP and its co-counsel in the matter Woods v. Google Inc., Case No. 11-cv-1263, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, have been prosecuting claims against Google related to its AdWords advertising program.\u00a0 Woods alleges that Google systematically overcharged advertisers for years in violation of [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/","og_site_name":"Nix Patterson, LLP","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Nix-Patterson-Roach-LLP-560328770976672\/","article_modified_time":"2025-08-13T08:33:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1522,"height":940,"url":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Screen-Shot-2022-12-23-at-11.58.57-AM.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Tiempo de lectura":"2 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/","url":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/","name":"NP's Summary Judgment vs. Google | Nix Patterson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/NP-ARTICLE-NEW-PDF.jpg","datePublished":"2017-09-28T15:43:27+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-13T08:33:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/NP-ARTICLE-NEW-PDF.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/NP-ARTICLE-NEW-PDF.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/practice-areas\/business-litigation\/npr-and-ktmc-defeat-motion-for-summary-judgment-by-google\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Nix Patterson, LLP","item":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NP Defeats Motion for Summary Judgment by Google"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/","name":"Nix Patterson, LLP","description":"A national contingency fee law firm providing litigation strategies and solutions","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Nix Law","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/#organization","name":"Nix Patterson, LLP","url":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/cropped-nix-logo-vector-logo-tag.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/cropped-nix-logo-vector-logo-tag.webp","width":1198,"height":272,"caption":"Nix Patterson, LLP"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Nix-Patterson-Roach-LLP-560328770976672\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/11394755\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news\/521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/news"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=521"},{"taxonomy":"news_attorney_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news_attorney_categories?post=521"},{"taxonomy":"news_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news_categories?post=521"},{"taxonomy":"news_practice_areas","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news_practice_areas?post=521"},{"taxonomy":"news_years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nixlaw.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news_years?post=521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}