How Compensation Helps Sexual Abuse Survivors Rebuild
Surviving sexual abuse leaves deep emotional, physical, and psychological scars. While no amount of money
Surviving sexual abuse leaves deep emotional, physical, and psychological scars. While no amount of money
For survivors of sexual abuse, the decision to pursue a legal claim can be empowering
NP serves as co-Lead Counsel in this action on behalf of Lead Plaintiff Arkansas Public Retirement System, representing a class of investors in SeaWorld securities in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The class alleges
On September 26, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a district court’s ruling in favor of the United States Department of Justice which found that American Express violated antitrust laws through its anti-steering rules
On August 29, 2016, NP filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts State Court, Suffolk County, on behalf of a female client against R.J. Reynolds, Cumberland Farms Supermarkets, and Garber Brothers alleging, among other things, the tobacco companies engaged in a decades-long
Following four years of contentious litigation, attorneys from Nix, Patterson & Roach, along with co-counsel, obtained an agreement from Fresenius Medical Care to settle the GranuFlo multi-district litigation for $250 million. NP attorneys Neil Smith played an integral role in
On July 13, 2016, NP filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts State Court, Suffolk County, on behalf of a male client against R.J. Reynolds, Philip Morris USA, Inc., DeMoulas Super Markets, Inc., and Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc. alleging, among other things, the
Nix Patterson serves as counsel in this action for plaintiff Intellectual Ventures versus Sally Beauty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Intellectual Ventures alleges that Sally Beauty infringes a variety of patents through the
On June 30, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the district court’s certification of the approximately seven billion dollar settlement class in the In Re Payment Card Interchange Fee And Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation. The
On June 30, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the district court’s certification of the approximately seven billion dollar settlement class in the In Re Payment Card Interchange Fee And Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation. The
NP served as co-Lead Counsel in this action, representing a class of investors in MGM securities in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The class alleged that MGM falsely misled the market regarding MGM’s ability to
Following four years of contentious litigation, attorneys from Nix, Patterson, along with co-counsel, obtained an agreement from Fresenius Medical Care to settle the GranuFlo multi-district litigation for $250 million. NP attorneys Neil Smith played an integral role in litigating the
NP represented a class of underpaid royalty owners in this action against SM Energy Co. and its successors, EnerVest and FourPoint. After vigorously prosecuting this action as class co-counsel for over four years, NP obtained a partial settlement with respect
NP partner Brad Beckworth tried this case to judgment with co-counsel in this declaratory judgment action requesting the court declare the rights of royalty owners and the obligations of lessees on four key issues of Oklahoma royalty law relating to
In 2015, NP obtained a historic settlement for the State of Florida against British Petroleum arising out of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. NP represented Florida in its effort to recover economic losses as a result of this disaster. Ultimately,
NP serves as co-Lead Counsel in this action on behalf of Plaintiff DSS Technology Management, Inc. in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. DSS alleges that Intel and various system integrators infringe DSS’s patents that claim
NP and its co-counsel, including Whitten Burrage, represented the Chickasaw and Choctaw Nations in a historic settlement with the federal government. The litigation involved allegations that the federal government mismanaged over 1.3 million acres of land and timber belonging to
NP is co-counsel in representing Azure Networks LLC in its multi-defendant case against Wi-Fi Direct chipmakers and system integrators. NP, along with its co-counsel have resolved much of the complex, multi-defendant case and has begun to dismiss various defendants.
On August 27, 2015, the Dallas Children’s Advocacy Center hosted its third annual Aim For Advocacy sporting clay tournament at the Dallas Gun Club, in Lewisville, Texas. The fundraiser is designed to engage sporting and outdoor enthusiasts in the Center’s
NP is excited to announce that well-known trial lawyer Austin Tighe has joined the firm in an of-counsel role. Austin comes to NP with more than 20 years of robust experience trying cases and managing complex litigation in many different
Nix Patterson, LLP is pleased to announce that Cody Hill has joined the Austin office of NP as an associate attorney. Cody joins the long list of other Baylor lawyers at the firm, graduating from the Baylor Law School in
NP represented a class of underpaid royalty owners in this action against Laredo Petroleum Inc. The class members in this case alleged Laredo unlawfully deducted certain post-production costs from the class members’ royalty payments. As a result of NP’s hard
The information on this site is for informational purposes only. Though it deals with legal issues, it should not be taken as legal advice for any specific case or situation. The law changes rapidly, and we make no warranty or guarantee about the accuracy or reliability of the content or links on this site. Every case and legal issue is different. Speak with a lawyer for specific advice.
This site is not intended to create, and viewing it does not create, an attorney-client relationship. The verdicts and settlements shown on this site are intended to be representative of cases Nix Patterson handles. These listings are not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of any other cases or claim. Results in litigation can never be guaranteed.
La información contenida en este sitio tiene únicamente fines informativos. Aunque trata de cuestiones jurídicas, no debe tomarse como asesoramiento jurídico para ningún caso o situación específicos. La legislación cambia rápidamente y no garantizamos la exactitud o fiabilidad de los contenidos o enlaces de este sitio. Cada caso y asunto jurídico es diferente. Hable con un abogado para obtener asesoramiento específico.
Este sitio no pretende crear, y su consulta no crea, una relación abogado-cliente. Los veredictos y acuerdos mostrados en este sitio pretenden ser representativos de los casos que maneja Nix Patterson. Estos listados no son una garantía o predicción del resultado de cualquier otro caso o reclamación. Los resultados en litigios nunca pueden ser garantizados.