Product liability law provides essential protections for consumers when faulty product designs lead to injuries. When a product is inherently dangerous due to poor design, legal recourse may be available for those affected.
These cases fall under “product liability,” which holds manufacturers, designers, and sellers accountable for the harm caused by their products. Below, we’ll explore the intricacies of product liability cases that arise due to defective product designs, from understanding the grounds for liability to the steps involved in filing a claim.
Product liability is an area of law that allows individuals injured by defective or dangerous products to seek compensation for their damages. This type of liability is unique in that it can apply to various parties involved in the design, manufacture, distribution, or sale of a product, each of whom may bear responsibility for product safety. Three main types of defects can lead to a product liability case:
In cases involving defective designs, the product is considered dangerous due to flaws in the conceptualization phase, meaning the risks would be present regardless of how well it is made. Here, we focus on product liability claims that stem specifically from design defects.
When a product’s design is defective, those harmed by it may have grounds for a lawsuit. To succeed in a product liability claim based on design defects, the injured party generally needs to demonstrate the following elements:
These elements create a foundation for holding a manufacturer or designer responsible for a faulty product, encouraging companies to prioritize consumer safety throughout the design process.
Design defects can arise in various products, and certain categories are especially prone to these issues. Some of the most frequently seen defective design cases involve:
Car manufacturers may face lawsuits when design flaws lead to dangerous conditions, such as rollover risks in SUVs, faulty airbag deployment, or inadequate crumple zones. Vehicle design defects can significantly increase the risk of severe injuries or fatalities in crashes, and victims may pursue compensation to cover medical bills, rehabilitation, and other losses.
Medical devices with defective designs — such as hip implants that deteriorate prematurely or pacemakers prone to malfunction — can cause severe harm to patients. These cases often involve claims of negligence or strict liability against manufacturers who failed to ensure their products were safe for long-term use.
Items designed for children, including toys, car seats, and cribs, require rigorous safety standards. If a children’s product has a design flaw that leads to choking hazards, falls, or other injuries, parents may have grounds for a lawsuit. Claims may argue that the product’s design failed to consider foreseeable risks to children’s safety.
Appliances like ovens, refrigerators, and space heaters can lead to product liability claims when a defective design creates fire risks, electrical hazards, or carbon monoxide exposure. For example, if a space heater’s design leads it to overheat easily and pose fire risks, users may have grounds for a lawsuit if they suffer injury or property damage.
Machinery and power tools must meet specific safety standards to prevent injuries during operation. Defective designs that lead to excessive vibration, malfunctioning guards, or unpredictable movements can endanger users. Manufacturers of these products may be liable if a design flaw directly contributes to an injury.
Proving a design defect typically requires detailed evidence, often from technical experts. Plaintiffs in these cases often pursue two primary approaches to demonstrate a defect:
This test assesses whether the product performed as a reasonable consumer would expect when used as intended. If the product fails to meet these expectations in a way that leads to injury, it may be deemed defective. For example, if a household appliance unexpectedly emits sparks, consumers could argue that the design fails to meet reasonable safety expectations.
Under the risk-utility test, the plaintiff argues that the risks associated with the product’s design outweigh its benefits. This analysis involves assessing factors such as:
Courts may use the risk-utility test to determine if a manufacturer could have reasonably designed the product in a safer manner without compromising its utility.
If you have been injured by a product with a design defect, pursuing a product liability claim can help cover your damages. Here are the essential steps:
Prompt medical care is crucial for treating your injuries and documenting their extent. Medical records also serve as essential evidence to demonstrate the impact of the defective product on your health.
It is critical to retain the product in its post-incident state, as this can serve as primary evidence in your case. Avoid altering or repairing it, and document any visible defects through photos or videos. This step helps ensure that you have a clear record of the defect.
Collect all records associated with the product, including purchase receipts, warranty information, and product manuals. Documentation of your injuries, medical expenses, and any communications with the manufacturer can also support your claim.
A product liability lawyer can help assess the strength of your case, identify liable parties, and guide you through the legal process. With experience in product defect cases, they can effectively represent your interests and work toward securing a fair outcome.
If the manufacturer or distributor is unwilling to settle your claim, your attorney may recommend filing a formal lawsuit. This step initiates the discovery process, during which both sides exchange evidence. Your lawyer may work with experts to analyze the product’s design and build a compelling case on your behalf.
In product liability cases, plaintiffs may seek several types of damages, which vary depending on the specific losses sustained.
Economic damages refer to tangible costs associated with the injury. These may include medical expenses related to treatments such as hospital stays, surgeries, and physical therapy. Additionally, plaintiffs may recover lost wages if the injury prevents them from working, and they may claim compensation for potential future earnings if their career is impacted. If the defective product caused property damage — such as harm to a vehicle or home — these costs can also be included under economic damages.
Non-economic damages address intangible losses that impact the plaintiff’s quality of life. This category includes compensation for pain and suffering due to the physical and emotional trauma associated with the injury. Plaintiffs may also claim emotional distress damages for the psychological effects of the incident, which can have a profound impact on day-to-day functioning. Furthermore, loss of enjoyment of life damages may be awarded if the injury limits the individual’s ability to participate in activities they once enjoyed, affecting their overall well-being.
Punitive damages, on the other hand, are reserved for cases where the defendant’s actions were particularly reckless or malicious. These damages are intended not to compensate the plaintiff directly but to penalize the defendant for severe negligence or willful misconduct. Punitive damages also serve as a deterrent against similar behavior in the future and are more common in cases involving gross negligence or where the company had knowledge of the product’s hazards and failed to act responsibly.
In order to secure compensation, though, there are deadlines you’re going to have to meet. That’s why it’s critical to understand the statute of limitations for your case.
The statute of limitations for product liability claims varies by state, but generally, you must file your claim within two to four years from the date of injury. In some states, the statute begins when the injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered.
Remember, the clock is ticking, and failing to file within this timeframe could result in your case being dismissed. An experienced product liability attorney can help ensure that you meet all deadlines and preserve your right to compensation. That’s why it’s important to contact a product liability lawyer as soon as possible.
Product liability cases involving defective designs are complex, often requiring expert testimony, detailed evidence, and a clear understanding of consumer rights. At Nix Patterson, we understand the stakes involved in these cases and are committed to pursuing justice for those harmed by dangerous products. If a defective product design has harmed you or a loved one, you need to consult with a product liability attorney who can guide you through your legal options and fight for the compensation you deserve.
Ready to get started? Contact Nix Patterson today for a free consultation.
Nix Patterson only works on a contingency fee basis. Our clients pay us nothing unless we win. Schedule a free consultation today.
"*" indicates required fields
The information on this site is for informational purposes only. Though it deals with legal issues, it should not be taken as legal advice for any specific case or situation. The law changes rapidly, and we make no warranty or guarantee about the accuracy or reliability of the content or links on this site. Every case and legal issue is different. Speak with a lawyer for specific advice.
This site is not intended to create, and viewing it does not create, an attorney-client relationship. The verdicts and settlements shown on this site are intended to be representative of cases Nix Patterson handles. These listings are not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of any other cases or claim. Results in litigation can never be guaranteed.
La información contenida en este sitio tiene únicamente fines informativos. Aunque trata de cuestiones jurídicas, no debe tomarse como asesoramiento jurídico para ningún caso o situación específicos. La legislación cambia rápidamente y no garantizamos la exactitud o fiabilidad de los contenidos o enlaces de este sitio. Cada caso y asunto jurídico es diferente. Hable con un abogado para obtener asesoramiento específico.
Este sitio no pretende crear, y su consulta no crea, una relación abogado-cliente. Los veredictos y acuerdos mostrados en este sitio pretenden ser representativos de los casos que maneja Nix Patterson. Estos listados no son una garantía o predicción del resultado de cualquier otro caso o reclamación. Los resultados en litigios nunca pueden ser garantizados.